|
|
The Nature of God
There are three main ways ‘Ultimate Reality’ is defined
in the religions of this world:
(1) A personal being (one who thinks, remembers, hears,
speaks, plans, responds, expresses emotion, demonstrates character,
exercises will and makes choices and judgments based on reason).
(2) An impersonal being (a non-thinking, non-hearing,
non-speaking, non-emotional, non-volitional, non-responsive ‘cosmic energy
force’ from which all personal beings originate and into which all
personal beings will ultimately be absorbed).1
(3) An eternal principle (a system of rules and laws that
govern the universe).
Many would say that these three interpretations of ‘Ultimate
Reality’ are actually one and the same. Though appearing to be uniquely
different, they can easily be merged in syncretistic harmony. But is that
possible? Can a personal God who constantly expresses himself emotionally and
makes rational choices be the same as a ‘Universal Principle’ that exists
apart from emotion and is governed by nothing more than a system of cosmic laws?
If all world religions spring from the same eternal Fountainhead-as separate,
yet related ‘divine streams,’ they should all bear a strong resemblance to
their original ‘Source.’ If they are all unique parts of a common global
spirituality, their interpretation of Ultimate Reality should be identical, or
at least run parallel. As you read the views on the nature of God contained in
this section, you will discover this is certainly not the case.2
Religions that acknowledge a Supreme Being portray him as transcendent
(existing above and beyond the material world), as immanent (present
within the material world) or various mixtures of these two views. Some of the
most recognized characterizations of God (or of supernatural realities) are as
follows:
Animism is the belief in a multitude of spiritual
beings that either bless or curse, help or harm man’s condition of
existence. These spirits have limited powers and localized dwelling places,
such as rivers, trees, and mountains. Some can also function on other planes
of existence, above or beneath the earth. Appeasing these spirits and
appealing to each spirit’s unique abilities or powers is very much a part
of primal religions.
Deism is the belief that after creating the
universe God trans-cended creation, leaving it to function on its own, in
accordance with certain rational laws. Understanding of God takes place
through reason, not revelation. God does not involve himself in the affairs
of men or the shaping of history.
Dualism is a belief in two supreme gods or powers
that are in opposition to each other.
Henotheism accepts the existence of many gods, but
exalts one to a position of greater prominence.
Monotheism is the belief that there is just one
God. Normally, monotheistic traditions, such as Christianity, Islam and
Judaism, do not subscribe to either pantheism or panentheism. In worldviews
such as these, God is immanent because he is omnipresent, but he is not
actually ‘manifested’ as the material universe. He is still
distinct from creation. Sikhism is an exception, definitely standing for
monotheism, yet embracing not a pantheistic, but a panentheistic stance on
creation.
Pantheism is the belief that the universe, with
its substances, laws and forces, is God in manifestation. In absolute
pantheism God does not exist apart from these. In ordinary pantheism, though
God is expressed as creation, God is not confined to creation.
By identifying the Creator with the creation, pantheism carries the concept
of the immanence of God to its furthest extreme. “All is God and God is
all.”
Panentheism is a modification of pantheism,
insisting that God is the principle behind nature, the essence of life within
creation, yet he has not manifested himself as creation. God is not
only immanent; he is also transcendent. He is both in the world, yet beyond
it. “All is in God and God is in all.”
Polytheism is a belief in the existence of many
gods. Each god is usually unique in some personality trait or in the care of
a specific facet of nature or a specific condition of human existence.
Theism is the belief in a Supreme Being that
highlights divine transcendence, yet believes in his immanence and his care
for those who are in this world. God is omnipotent, omniscient, and
omnipresent in theism. He is perfect, even though evil exists in the world.
He is a personal God and often intervenes in the affairs of men. The life of
creation is a gift from God, but is not a manifestation of God.
1 This is the strict interpretation of an ‘Impersonal
Cosmic Energy Force’ as Ultimate Reality. Some seekers who say they believe in
an Impersonal God as Ultimate Reality also, at times, grant some personal
attributes to what they would term an ‘Impersonal God.’ Such a practice is
not consistent with the terminology being used.
2 Ernest Valea, “God or the Ultimate Reality, and Creation,” Many
Paths to One Goal? www.comparativereligion.com. (June 20, 2000) On
his excellent website, Ernest Valea offers these three categories as the
fundamental interpretations of Ultimate Reality in world religions.
The
Eleven Main Living Religions
Buddhism: There are diverse opinions within the Buddhist
camp concerning the nature of Ultimate Reality. The oldest sect, Theravada
Buddhism (called the Lesser Vehicle), is often labeled atheistic
because Buddha did not train his disciples to worship any deity. However, “ancient
Buddhist doctrines do not deny the existence of gods.” On the contrary, Buddha
acknowledged the existence of gods inhabiting the cosmos, yet he insisted that
they are “impermanent like all other living beings. Thus, they too must escape
rebirth through nirvana.”1 It is possible
that Buddha had contempt for the Indian concept of gods and goddesses because
they indulged in sensual behavior or exhibited human frailties. Some Buddhists
go a step further, explaining like Reginald Ray-”that while they [deities]
appear to exist on a relative level, they have no final reality. Instead they
are projections of the deepest qualities of our own human nature.”2
Unlike some other branches of Buddhism, Theravada Buddhists do not revere Buddha
as a god. He is considered merely a teacher, an enlightened master. Most would
agree that even speculating about the nature of God is useless, a hindrance to
achieving enlightenment.
Mahayana Buddhism (called the Greater Vehicle)
contains many different schools. Zen Buddhism professes that there is no
god who can assist a seeker in achieving enlightenment (satori) or final
extinction (paranirvana). Yet other Mahayana schools emphasize that
Gautama Buddha was a mere earthly manifestation of a transcendent, celestial
Buddha, who is the highest deity. Ultimate Reality is shunya (the
void)-an impersonal cosmic force that expresses itself through various gods,
buddhas and bodhisattvas who are worshipped. Bodhisattvas are enlightened beings
who delay Nirvana in order to aid others in their spiritual evolution.
Pure Land Buddhists worship Amida Buddha, (different than the Gautama
Buddha) as a personal savior god. He is also called Amitabha. He was originally
a monk, Dharmakara, who attained Buddhahood. Nichiren Buddhists place
their faith in Nichiren, a thirteenth century Japanese monk, who is believed to
be a reincarnation of Jogyo. According to this sect, Jogyo was a bodhisattva
(one who attains Buddhahood but delays passing into Nirvana in order to bring
spiritual assistance to others through his boundless supply of good merits). Tibetan
Buddhism promotes worshipful devotion to a long line of Dalai Lamas. The
most recent one, Tenzin Byatso, is the fourteenth and is presently exiled from
Tibet. All Dalai Lamas are considered to be bodhisattvas, as well as
incarnations of their predecessors. Tibetan Buddhists worship a pantheon
of innumerable Buddhas, bodhisattvas, gods, goddesses and divine beings. Image
worship is spurned in some branches of Buddhism, yet promoted in others.
1 J. Isamu Yamamoto, Buddhism, Taoism & Other Far
Eastern Religions (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1998)
p. 61.
2 Reginald A. Ray, “Religion Without God,” Shambala
Sun (July 2001) p. 26.
Christianity: Christian doctrine teaches there is one God
to the exclusion of all others, and that he has a triune nature. The Godhead is
comprised of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. These three are one. They
are distinct from one another, yet not divided. They work in perfect unison and
they are never in conflict with each other. Jesus Christ is revealed in John’s
writings as the Word who was “with God” in the beginning and yet “was God.”
(John 1:1) He has no beginning and no end, existing “from everlasting
to everlasting.” (Micah 5:2 KJV, Psalm 90:2) Whenever God appeared in
any form during the Old Testament era (such as the ‘Pillar of Fire’ leading
the Israelites through the desert) that was a manifestation of the pre-incarnate
Christ. (See 1 Corinthians 10:4.) In his incarnation, Jesus is
described as being “God manifested in the flesh.” (1 Timothy 3:16)
The personal God of Christianity is the personal God of
Judaism: the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He is so holy and flawless he
cannot be tempted with evil, neither does he tempt any man. (See James
1:13-14.) There is no negative, evil or dark side to his nature. (See 1
John 1:5.) He is transcendent: existing above and beyond this material
world. Yet he is also immanent, actively manifesting himself in this world and
making himself accessible to men. (See Jeremiah 23:23-24, Ephesians 3:17.)
Through the example and teachings of Jesus, the Creator was
especially revealed as the “heavenly Father” who is motivated by a deep
concern for mankind. The apostle John explained, “God so loved the world that
he gave his only begotten Son.” (John 3:16)
Idolatry is prohibited in Christianity. Some branches of Christianity use
statues and icons, though not in the same sense as idols. Other Christian sects
speak against this practice as being non-biblical and idolatrous.
Confucianism: In this worldview, more a philosophy of life than a
religion, Ultimate Reality is primarily described as a universal law, a moral
principle, omnipresent, invisible and eternal. Confucius contended, “There is
no place in the highest heavens above or in the deepest waters below where the
moral law is not to be found.” (Doctrine of the Mean 12) However,
popular Confucianism has been mixed with other beliefs, becoming polytheistic
and animistic. Numerous deities and divine beings are worshipped. Some adherents
promoted the worship of Confucius himself, though this practice was never
popular. In recent years, the temples of Confucius have fallen into great
neglect. Ancestor worship is also encouraged, conducted at special altars
erected in the home or temple.
Hinduism: Hinduism accepts the existence of many gods.
However, most Hindus believe that all gods are emanations of the One God who
pervades everything. Consequently, some might describe this worldview as
monotheistic polytheism. In the Upanishads, Ultimate Reality is described as the
impersonal Brahman. Brahman is described as possessing two aspects: transcendent
(unmanifested) and immanent (manifested). According to the Sankhya School,
Ultimate Reality manifests in two main ways: as consciousness (purusha)
and as material form (prakriti). Upon manifesting, “it” (the word “Brahman”
is neuter gender) is expressed in a multitude of ways, including lesser gods and
demigods. Ultimate Reality, which is impersonal (“without attributes”-nirguna),
manifests in numerous deities who are personal (“with attributes”-saguna).
“Nirguna Brahman is not an object of prayer, but of meditation and knowledge.”1
According to the Puranas, the most important manifestations
of Brahman make up the Hindu triad (or Trimurti)-Brahma (the Creator), Vishnu
(the Preserver), and Shiva (the Destroyer). It should be noted, though, that in
the Vedas (the most revered and ancient sacred texts) Vishnu is seldom mentioned
and Shiva is left out altogether.
Some Bhakti sects (devotional sects) in Hinduism are
henotheistic, exalting a singular god, such as Vishnu, Shiva or Krishna, to a
place of superiority or prominence above all others. Multiplied thousands of
gods are worshipped (the traditional figure is 330 million). Hindu Scripture
encourages, “O gods! All your names [and forms] are to be revered, saluted and
adored.” (Rig-Veda 10.63.2) Some gods are associated with nature, like
Surya the sun god; others with animals, such as Ganesha the elephant-god and
Hanuman the monkey-god. Brahman is the underlying Self, the essence of life
common to all things. This equates the creation with the Creator-the former is
an emanation of the latter. Some Hindus profess a pantheistic view of the
relationship between the Creator and the creation; while others hold a
panentheistic view.
Though most Hindus are quite tolerant and quick to declare
that all religions are one, historical Hinduism is still somewhat exclusive in
its claims to correct revelation. Their Scripture states, “In the beginning
this [universe] was Brahman alone…whoever reveres any other deity…does not
rightly understand.” (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.10) In other words,
worshipping any personal deity as Ultimate Reality is an unenlightened view of
the supreme essence of God. Some Hindus even propose that those who make this
error are kept in the cycle of death and rebirth as a result.
For those who subscribe to Brahman being “the origin, the cause and basis
of all existence,” the same is an infinitely inexhaustible reservoir of (1)
Pure being (sat); (2) Pure intelligence (cit); (3) Pure delight (ananda).2
However, this Ultimate Expression of Divinity is beyond the comprehension of the
human mind. The Kena Upanishad bluntly informs, “He who thinks he knows
Brahman, knows not.” Image worship is accepted and cultivated in Hinduism,
though some claim it is only an aid in worship for the spiritually immature.
1 Bansi Pandit, The Hindu Mind (Glen Ellyn, Illinois:
B & V Enterprises, Inc., 3rd ed., 1998) p. 54.
2 “Concepts of Hinduism,” Eerdman’s Handbook to the
World’s Religions (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdman’s Publishing
Company, 1982) p. 185.
Islam: Islam is strongly monotheistic, teaching that
Allah is the only true God. This name for the Creator probably stems from al
illah, meaning “the God.” To associate God with any created thing
is the most abominable of sins and is called shirk. Because of this,
Islam does not accept the pantheon of Hindu gods, the Trinity of Christianity,
or the deification of any religious leader. God has no partner nor equal. The
word “Allah” in Arabic cannot be plural and is actually neither male nor
female.
Though Allah is a personal God, most Muslims consider him so
lofty as to be incomprehensible to the minds of finite men. God never speaks
directly to men; he always sends a messenger: either an angel or a prophet.
However, for those who are truly devoted God grants noor hidayah-the “light
of guidance.” This is the ‘opening of a person’s heart’ to understand
Allah’s nature and ways. Sufism, an offshoot of Islam, teaches differently:
that Allah is personally accessible, and that ecstatic, mystical experiences
with God are obtainable, especially through a whirling kind of sacred dance.
Allah has 99 names, all of which describe various divine attributes (e.g.,
the Living, the Eternal, the Supreme, the Tremendous, the Merciful and the
Compassionate). He is transcendent, independent of the material universe and
perfect in all his ways. Muslims believe strongly in the sovereignty of God, to
the point that all events in life are traceable to his will. A byword often
heard among Muslims is, “if Allah wills.” A great emphasis is placed on
Allah’s justice and mercy. Idolatry or image worship is strictly prohibited in
Islam.
Jainism: The founder, Mahavira, taught no separate
existence of God. Everyone can attain god-hood by making supreme efforts in the
right direction. Later deified by his followers, Mahavira is described in
Jainist Scripture as descending from heaven, living a sinless life and worthy of
worship as the “Omniscient.” He is revered as the twenty-fourth Tirthankara
(meaning Ford-maker, a great teacher who guides his followers across the river
of transmigration).
Five different types of ‘Supreme Beings’ are venerated in
the Jainist religion. Dedicated Jainists participate daily in certain rituals
aimed at invoking these ‘Supreme Beings’: (1) Arhats-also known as
Jinas (conquerors, great teachers) or Tirthankaras (Ford-makers). Because they
have been liberated from the world and its affairs, though they are worshipped,
Tirthankaras cannot intervene personally in the lives of their devotees; (2) Siddhas-perfected
saints, those who have attained liberation and dwell in eternal ecstasy at the
uppermost part of the universe; (3) Archaryas-spiritual teachers who lead
monastic orders; (4) Upadhyayas-teaching monks who train other monks and
nuns; (5) Monks-devotees who live the life of a monk (necessary for
salvation, according to some Jains).1
Though Mahavira initially refused the multiplicity of gods found in Hinduism,
modern Jainism has developed into a polytheistic belief system. For instance,
along with superior deities, “there are in heaven and hell ninety-nine kinds
of gods who are regarded as menial because they serve.”2 Image
worship is presently accepted among some Jains, though originally Mahavira
taught against this practice. Two principal sects reject the use of temples and
idols.
1 Philip Wilkinson, “Jain History and Beliefs,” Illustrated
Dictionary of Religions (New York, New York: DK Publishing, 1999) p. 46.
2 Stevenson, Heart of Jainism, p. 270; quoted in
Robert E. Hume, The World’s Living Religions (New York: Charles
Scribner’s Sons, rev. ed. 1936) p. 51.
Judaism: Passionately monotheistic, Judaism teaches that
there is only one God to the exclusion of all others. He is omnipotent,
omniscient and omnipresent: the sole Creator and Sustainer of the universe. In
Isaiah 44:6 God declares, “I am the first and I am the last; apart from me
there is no God.” A greatly revered passage in Scripture is Deuteronomy 6:4
(the Shema): “Hear, O Israel: The Lord is our God, the Lord alone.” (JPS)
God is transcendent (independent of the material universe), holy and perfect in
all his ways. Idolatry and any representation of God are strictly prohibited.
The first two commandments of the Decalogue declare, “I am the LORD your God,
who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall
have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or
any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them
nor serve them.” (Exodus 20:2-4) God is formless. Anthropomorphisms
found in Scripture are merely symbolic, a literary device used to emphasize some
aspect of God’s character.
The ineffable name of God is considered so holy it is not
even written in common writing. In the original Hebrew it is represented by the
tetragrammaton: transliterated either JHVH or YHWH. Translators have rendered
this Jehovah or more correctly, Yahweh, but neither is fully accepted by most
Jews. When the tetragrammaton appears in Scripture, those who are reading
usually insert the name “Adonai” (meaning “Lord”). The knowledge of the
correct pronunciation of the name of God is something else the Messiah will
restore when he comes.
Shinto: The word Shinto means “the way of the kami.”
This stems from two Chinese words: shen meaning “divine being” and tao
meaning “way.” The word kami refers primarily to the various gods or
deities worshipped in this religion. However, it also relates to the sacred
essence abiding in both animate and inanimate objects (such as oceans,
mountains, waterfalls, trees, plants and animals). Specifically, it alludes to
the spirits that dwell in the numerous shrines dedicated to them. Generally
speaking, the word kami can be used in reference to anything
awe-inspiring, mysterious or impressive-including that which is evil. On the
highest level this term speaks of the Divine Consciousness that flows through
all things, the vital force of the universe.
Originally almost all Shinto gods were identified with forces
or objects in nature, such as: Tsuki-yomi, the moon god, and Kagase-wo, the star
god. Different kami fulfill different functions, such as: Fudo, who
guards against danger or misfortune; Yakushi, who imparts healing for the mind
and the body; or Inari, the rice god who brings an abundant harvest. Some kami
are righteous in character, while others are wicked, like the evil god
Susa-no-wo, and a whole group of “lying deities.” (Nihon-gi 1:20,
Ko-ji-ki, 229) There are at least 3,700 gods who have shrines dedicated to
their worship, though a common declaration is that there are 800 myriads of
deities.
Shinto emphasizes the worship of ancestors as divine beings, because all
eventually become kami (thirty-three years after death). Worship of
emperors as direct, divine descendents of Ama-terasu, the sun goddess, has also
been a dominant theme until recent years.
Sikhism: Sikhs believe in a monotheistic view of God, as
revealed to the founder, Guru Nanak. God is described as being “timeless and
without form,” the Creator, Sustainer and Director of the universe. Sikhism
emerged in the early 1500’s in a culture and geographical area dominated by
Hinduism, yet it does not accept the pantheon of Hindu gods, nor Hindu concepts
like pantheism, monism and the caste system. Yet this religion is very
syncretistic, teaching that all religions and sects are merely using different
names for the same God. “There is but One though your forms be unnumbered,
Guru of gurus, Creator of all.”1 Another
scripture adds, “From nothingness the Formless One assumes a form, the
Attribute-free becomes full of attributes.”(Adi Granth, p. 940)
The main name attributed to the Ultimate Deity in Sikhism is
Sat Nam (“True Name”). Other important designations are: Sat (“Truth”),
Sat Guru (“True Guru”), Karta Purakh (“Creator”), Akal Purakh (“Timeless
Being”) and Wahi-Guru (“Wondrous Guru”). The God of Sikhism is a God of
grace (unmerited love). God is the Eternal Guru or Teacher. Sikhs consider God
to be both Father and Mother; they do not attribute a specific gender to the
Creator.
The doctrine of Brahma, the Creator god in Hinduism, dying and then being
reborn in a new era of manifestation is refuted in Sikhism. (See “Hinduism”
under Worldviews Contrasted: Cycles, Ages and the Ultimate State of the
Universe.) In the Mool Mantra Sikhs make a confession of their faith.
In it is the statement, “There is One God…the Omnipresent, pervades the
universe…is not born, nor dies to be born again.” He is also described as
being “without fear” and “without hate.” The concept of Avatars, or God
incarnating in human form, is a contested doctrine among Sikhs. Idolatry or
image worship is outlawed.
1 From the Kirtan Sohila, an evening prayer.
Taoism: Lao-Tzu, founder of Taoism (pronounced “Dowism”)
explained his interpretation of Ultimate Reality in the following terms: “There
was something undifferentiated and yet complete, which existed before heaven and
earth. Soundless and formless, it depends on nothing and does not change.
It operates everywhere and is free from danger. It may be
considered the mother of the universe. I do not know its name; I call it
Tao.” (Tao-te Ching 25, emphasis by author)
Five times the governing principle of the universe is
described in this passage, not as a he, but as an it. So Ultimate
Reality in Taoism is not someone personal, but rather something
impersonal, an existing order that guides all things. One source declares this
to be simply the “rhythm of the universe.”1 This
Universal Principle is both yin and yang, negative and positive,
passive and active, darkness and light. Though yin is not always
synonymous with evil, the existence of evil would be assigned to the yin principle
in creation. In contrast, good would be assigned to yang, its
complementary opposite. (See the explanation of the yin-yang symbol on page 5.)
The word “Tao” means the Way. It speaks of ‘the
way’ all things function in harmony, from the smallest atom to the largest
swirling galaxy. Beyond human comprehension, “The cosmic Tao is invisible,
inaudible, unnamable, undiscussable, inexpressible.”2
The cosmic Tao is not a personal Creator and Lord to whom men are
accountable or by whom men are ruled-“It [the Tao] creates them but never
tries to own them…It raises them but never tries to control them. Herein lies
its mysterious virtue.” (Tao-te Ching 51) Wu (Being) and Yu (Not-Being)
are terms for the two aspects of the eternal Tao (the Seen and the Unseen, the
Manifested and the Unmanifested). Yu (Not-Being) is not a reference to
nothingness, but rather, an absence of observable characteristics.
Taoism is pluralistic. Many personal gods are worshipped. The
founder of this religion, Lao-Tzu, is considered by many Taoists to be the
highest of all deities. In this exalted role he is known as T’ai-shang
Laochün. Viewed as the original personification or emanation of the Tao, he is
sometimes known as the Emperor of the Undifferentiated Realm (Hun-yuan Huang-ti).
Out of Lao-chün were emanated the Three Pure Ones (the Celestial Lords of the
Three Pure Realms). Next come “the Jade Emperor, who passes judgment on
mortals and decides their fate,” and the Mother Empress of the West, the
goddess who “decides who attains immortality.”3
And there are many other deities worshipped in Taoism. Some have existed from
various stages in creation, while many others are individuals who attained
immortality or expressed great goodness during their earthly sojourn, thus
obtaining a high place of recognition in the celestial world. To these personal
gods Taoists pray hoping for divine intervention. Especially emphasized are the
“the “Three Star Gods” (Shou Hsing, God of Longevity: Tsai Shen, God of
Wealth; and Fu Shen, God of Happiness) and the “Eight Immortals.”
1 “God,” Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 99.
2 F. Max Muller, ed., The Sacred Books of the East
(Oxford, 1879-1910) 40:68-69; quoted in Robert E. Hume, The World’s Living
Religions (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, rev. ed. 1936) p. 141.
3 Eva Wong, The Shambhala Guide to Taoism (Boston:
Shambhala Publications, Inc. 1997) p. 160.
Zoroastrianism: Teaches a dualistic view of God, that
there are two eternally existent gods. Ahura Mazda (meaning “Wise Lord,”
also called Ohrmazd) is the God of light who is assisted by ahuras, which
are good spirits or angels. He is counterbalanced and opposed by Angra Mainyu
(also called Ahriman, “the bad spirit”), the evil Prince of darkness who is
assisted by evil spirits called daevas. At one point these two gods were
believed to be twin brothers born of the god, Zurvan (a name meaning “Infinite
Time”)-the Ultimate Essence of deity in Zoroastrianism. However, worship of
Zurvan (the unified aspect of a dualistic Godhead) is now considered by most
Zoroastrians an erroneous concept and a heretical practice.
Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu have always been, from the
beginning of time, self-existent, co-equal and able to create. Yielding to one
or the other determines whether a person is participating in the Kingdom of
Light, Wisdom and Justice or the Kingdom of the Darkness, Falsehood and Evil.
These will continue to struggle against each other for a position of supremacy
until the end of the age when Ahura Mazda finally overcomes. Because of this
prophesied ultimate triumph, most Zoroastrians consider themselves, not
dualistic, but monotheistic.
Ahura Mazda created Spenta Mainyu (meaning Bounteous Spirit, similar to the
Holy Spirit) to oppose the Destructive Spirit, Angra Mainyu. Six other divine
beings (three male and three female) are also individually worshipped. They are
called the “Beneficient Immortals” (Amesha Spentas). They are Asha
Vahishta (Justice, Truth), Vohu Manah (Righteous Thinking), Armaiti (Devotion),
Khshathra Vairya (Desirable Dominion), Haurvatat (Wholeness) and Ameretat
(Immortality). These archangel-like entities were created by Ahura Mazda to help
govern his creation. Their golden thrones surround his throne in the celestial
world. Fire is especially sacred in Zoroastrian worship, being representative of
divine emanation.
Other
Religions, Sects or Teachers
Bahá’í: God cannot be known or experienced directly. All created
things reflect qualities or attributes of God. So a seeker can gain knowledge of
God by observing nature, saintly human beings, or most perfectly, by studying
the lives of those select messengers known as “Manifestations of God.”1
Shoghi Effendi (guardian and leader of the Bahá’í faith from
1921-1957) described God as “one, personal, unknowable, inaccessible, eternal,
omniscient, omnipresent and almighty…a supreme reality.” He firmly “rejected
incarnationist, pantheistic and anthropomorphic conceptions of God,” insisting
that “human conceptions of God are mere imaginations, which some individuals
mistake for reality.” However, since God’s attributes are best expressed in
human beings, Bahá’ís are encouraged to “turn their gaze to their own
selves” in order to find God.2 Mystical
experiences also grant insight into the divine nature. The greatest name of God
is Bahá.3
1 See the explanation of the beliefs of Baha’i under the question “Was
Jesus just one of many avatars or was he the only incarnation of God?” in the
Various Articles and FAQ section.
2 Peter Smith, “God,” A Concise Encyclopedia of the Bahá’í Faith
(Oxford, England: Oneworld Publications, 2000) pp. 164-165.
3 Ibid., “Bahá’u’lláh: Theological Status,” p. 79.
Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual Organization (Raja Yoga):
God is the Supreme Soul, the Father-a personal God (one having a ‘personality’).
The correct name for God is Shiva, which basically means “benefactor father,
the seed of creation and point-source and implies that there can be no other
creator above Him.”1 He is “the supreme
teacher, guide, liberator, friend and purifier of human souls.” Usually the
word “Baba,” meaning “father,” is joined to the name Shiva by true
devotees.
Though omniscient and omnipotent, God is not omnipresent. To
describe him this way would mean that God permeates all things. Therefore, “if
God were omnipresent He would be responsible for good and evil.”2
The doctrinal explanation of the relationship between God and the universe is
this: “Human souls created the present human systems, not God…If God had
really created everything, then my woes would also be His will-and we know that
cannot be the case.”3 So the pantheistic
union of the Creator with the creation is not accepted in this worldview.
God does not possess a subtle body, neither is he formless. He is light, an
infinitesimal point of radiant light residing in one location. However, God is
not light-years away from human beings. He can be contacted as quickly as a
prayerful thought passing through the mind of a worshipper. Only in a figurative
sense does God dwell in the heart of human beings-through love. His real home is
in the Soul World. What human beings perceive as ‘God within’ is really only
their collective impressions of him. God is changeless and his attributes are
constant and perfect.
1 New Beginnings (Pandav Bhawan, Mount Abu, Rajasthan, India: Brahma Kumaris
Ishwariya Vishwa Vidyalaya, 1996) p. 45.
2 Ibid., p. 50.
3 Ibid., p. 50-51.
ECKANKAR: The founder of this sect, Paul Twitchell, describes Ultimate
Reality as a ‘cosmic current,’ existent everywhere and in all things (a
pantheistic, monistic view). God is detached and unconcerned about man and the
universe. Paul Twitchell’s main name for God is SUGMAD (pronounced SOOG’MAHD).
The manifestation of the Absolute is called ECK-a word also used as an
abbreviated form of the word ECKANKAR. The most ancient, secret name for God is
HU (pronounced HYOO).
Gnosticism: The Supreme God, the Highest of All, “interposes between
himself and finite creatures a long chain of aeons or middle beings, emanations
from the divine, which together constitute the Pleroma or fullness of the divine
essence. It is only through these intermediate beings that the highest God can
enter into various relations with created beings.”1
1 Louis Berkhof, The History of Christian Doctrine (Grand
Rapids: Baker Book House, 1981) p. 47; quoted in Ron Rhodes, The Counterfeit
Christ of the New Age Movement (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House,
1990) p. 17.
ISKCON (International Society for Krishna Consciousness):
According to the teachings of Swami Prabhupada, Krishna is the principal
expression of the Godhead, exceeding even the impersonal Brahman. He admits, “There
is a common controversy over whether the Supreme Absolute Truth is personal or
impersonal. As far as Bhagavad-Gita is concerned, the Absolute Truth is the
Personality of Godhead, Sri Krishna…the primeval Lord, the reservoir of all
pleasure…the eternal form of complete bliss and knowledge.”1
This is undoubtedly a departure from classical, philosophic,
Hindu doctrine, which teaches the impersonal Brahman as the Ultimate Expression
and Absolute Essence of Deity. However, this unique approach is not without
support in Hindu Scripture. In the Bhagavad-Gita, Krishna asserts, “I am the
origin of all this world and its dissolution as well. There is nothing higher
than I.” (Bhagavad-Gita 7.6-8) In another Scripture source (the Hari-vamsa),
Brahman is relegated to a somewhat inferior status. Krishna explains, “The
glaring effulgence of the impersonal Brahman [the impersonal Absolute]
illuminates all existences, both material and spiritual. But…you must
understand that this Brahman illumination is the effulgence of My body.”2
Deity-forms are accepted and encouraged in ISKCON facilities. (The term “idols,”
having a negative connotation, is not used.) Though God is everywhere, it is
believed that he makes himself tangibly available for worship in his
deity-forms. Images of Krishna are bathed, clothed, and ‘fed.’ Followers
drink the water used to bathe them. They also eat food offerings. This is called
prasada-a method used to purify the consciousness.
1 A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, Bhagavad-Gita As It
Is (New York: Collier Books, 1972) p.365.
2 A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, The Science of Self
Realization (Los Angeles, California: The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1998) p.
8.
Kabbala (Mystical Judaism): God or Ultimate
Reality, is called Ein Sof (meaning “Infinite” or “Without End”). Ein
Sof is not personal, but rather, an impersonal principle, a supreme divine will
beyond human reasoning. Ten emanations stream forth from Ein Sof, called Sefirot,
that personify ten different aspects of the divine nature. As seekers come
back into union with God, the Sefirot are “ten stages…by which God the
Creator can be discerned.”1
The generally accepted order and naming of the Sefirot are:
(1) Keter Elyon (“Supreme Crown”); (2) Hokhmah (“Wisdom”);
(3) Binah (“Understanding”); (4) Hesed (“Lovingkindness”)
or Gedullah (“Greatness”); (5) Gevurah (“Power”) or Din
(“Judgment”); (6) Tiferet (“Beauty”); (7) Nezah (“Victory”
or “Lasting Endurance”); (8) Hod (“Splendor” or “Majesty”);
(9) Zaddick (“Righteous One”) or Yesod Olam (“Foundation of
the World”); (10) Malkhut (“Kingdom”) or Atarah (“Diadem”).2
There is a female aspect of God as expressed in the third and
tenth Sefirot. Referred to as the Shekinah, she is considered the bride
of God. She is a demiurge, a lesser deity who manifests creative powers. She is
also considered the daughter of God and mother of man. Normally, Kabbalists do
not embrace pantheism. “Nature may be the garment of God, as the Zohar
teaches, but it is not the body of God.”3
According to Kabbalistic tradition, though God is omniscient, omnipotent and
omnipresent, ‘It’ (Ein Sof is without gender) has surrendered some of its
sovereign power over the world to allow humanity to function according to ‘free
will.’ This is called tzimtzum (“self-limitation”).
1 “Sefirot,” Miriam-Webster ’s Encyclopedia of World
Religions (Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam- Webster, Incorporated, 1999)
p. 982.
2 These names and numbering of the Sefirot were
primarily obtained from the Encyclopedia Judaica, in the article titled
“Kabbalah,” (Jerusalem, Israel: Keter Publishing House, Ltd., 1971) Columns
570-571.
3 Kenneth Boa, Cults, World Religions and the Occult
(Wheaton, Illinois: Victor Books, 1990) p. 178.
Kriya Yoga (Paramahansa Yogananda): Though on the highest
level of reality, God is impersonal, he can be persuaded to take a personal form
by intense devotion being generated toward him. Confining God to just the role
of an impersonal Being is “a philosophical error, because God is everything:
personal as well as impersonal.”1 Because he created humans as
personal beings, “their Originator could not be wholly impersonal.”2
“The Lord is Spirit; the Impersonal is invisible. But when
He created the physical world He became God the Father. As soon as He assumed
the role of Creator, He became personal. He became visible: this whole universe
is the body of God.”3 “In forming for Himself a physical body of
planetary systems, God manifested three aspects: cosmic consciousness, cosmic
energy and cosmic mass or matter.”4
Yogananda especially promoted the idea of addressing God
either as the “Heavenly Father” or the “Divine Mother.” He insisted that
if a person approaches God in this latter role, his prayers are especially
efficacious. He also taught that a seeker can approach God in any form and by
any name, and God will respond.
In interpreting the concept of the Trinity, Yogananda offered, “The Father
(Sat) is God as the Creator existing beyond creation. The Son (Tat)
is God’s omnipresent intelligence existing in creation. The Holy Ghost (Aum)
is the vibratory power of God that objectifies or becomes creation.”5
1 Paramahansa Yogananda, How You Can Talk with God (Los
Angeles, California: Self-Realization Fellowship, 1997) p. 14.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid., p. 21.
4 Ibid., p. 22.
5 Paramahansa Yogananda, Journey to Self-Realization (Los
Angeles, California: Self-Realization Fellowship) p. 437, under “Trinity.”
Kundalini Yoga (Yogi Bhajan): Offers a monistic and pantheistic view
of God. “We have never realized what God is. On the other hand, we say, “God
is omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent.” We say it. We know it. We all
agree to it. We expect to find him in a church, in a temple; we find him here,
we find him there. God is a stick, God is a cup, God is a man, God is a woman;
God is everything and God is nothing-anything which exists in any totality…that
dance goes on…Hindus call it anhat, Christians call it communion,
Buddhists call it light, Confucians call it wisdom, a Sikh knows it as ecstasy.
All is one and one is all.”1
1 Yogi Bhajan (Siri Singh Sahib Bhai Sahib Harbhajan Singh
Kalsa Yogiji), The Teachings of Yogi Bhajan, The Power of the Spoken Word (Pamona,
California: Arcline Publications, 1977) p. 77, #277.
Meher Baba: God is beyond all distinction and thought, the one Reality
at the heart of all religions. God is both an Impersonal Absolute and personal
in manifestation. Creation is an emanation of God himself. “God has three
Infinite aspects: Knowledge, Power, Bliss.”1 There are “Ten
Principal States of God:” (1) God in Beyond Beyond State; (2) God in Beyond;
(3) God as Emanator, Sustainer and Dissolver; (4) God as an Embodied Soul; (5)
God as a Soul in the State of Evolution; (6) God as a Human Soul in the State of
Reincarnation; (7) God in the State of Spiritually Advanced Souls; (8) God as
the Divinely Absorbed; (9) God as a Liberated Incarnate Soul; (10) God as a
Man-God and God-Man.2 A Man-God is a Spiritually Perfect Master. A
God-Man is the Avatar, the Christ. God in his original state existed in “infinite
unconsciousness.”3 (See The Origin and Nature of the Universe.) The
first two states mentioned above are descriptions of God in an Impersonal State.
The third is a semi-personal state, while the other seven states concern God
manifesting in creation. The evolution of creation is actually the process of
God discovering himself, or becoming fully conscious of his own divinity and
nature.
1 Meher Baba, The Everything and the Nothing (Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina: Sheriar Press, Inc., 1995) p. 98.
2 Meher Baba, God Speaks (Walnut Creek, California:
Sufism Reoriented, 1973) pp. 158-159.
3 Bhau Kalchuri, Lord Meher, vol. 3 (Asheville, North,
Carolina: Manifestation, Inc.) pp. 988-989, Meherabad, December 1927.
Scientology: The Church of Scientology has “no set dogma concerning
God that it imposes on its members.”1 Such a practice is not meant
to imply an atheistic, agnostic or non-caring attitude about this vital subject.
Quite the contrary, L. Ron Hubbard taught that men “without a strong and
lasting faith in a Supreme Being are less capable, less ethical and less
valuable to themselves and society… A man without an abiding faith is, by
observation alone, more a thing than a man.”2 As adherents expand
their spirituality and awareness, they will come to their own realizations
concerning the “Allness of all.” who is commonly called God. The Supreme
Being or Creator is more correctly and simply defined as “infinity.”
1 Church of Scientology International, What is
Scientology? (Los Angeles, California: Bridge Publications, Inc., 1993,
1998) p. 530.
2 Church of Scientology International, Scientology Theology
& Practice of a Contemporary Religion, 2000, www.bonafidescientology.org/chapter/02/page20.htm
(accessed October 22, 2002). The book on which this website is based was
published in 1998.
Sufism (Mystical Islam): In the beginning, before
the manifestation of creation, the only thing existing was Dhat (the
essence of Being). It existed as nothing, a formless Being. Then “a
consciousness arose out of the Absolute, a consciousness of existence…This
stage is called Wahdah.” From this original consciousness a sense
developed…which formed the Ego, the Logos, which is termed Wahdaniyyah by
the Sufis...the all-pervading radiance formed its center…the divine Spirit, or
the Nur, in Sufi terminology-Arwah.”1
God is utterly transcendent, for he cannot be compared to any created thing.
Even so, he is to be discovered within the heart. Ibn al-Arabi, an early leader,
implied a somewhat pluralistic view with the statement, “in every object of
worship there is a reflection of Reality.” He also asserted, “We ourselves
are the attributes by which we describe God; our existence is merely an
objectification of His existence.”2 In Sufism is found a synthesis
of an impersonal view of Ultimate Reality (as found in the Eastern traditions)
and a personal and relational view of God (as found in the Western traditions).
The pronoun “Hu” is recognized by Sufis to mean the indwelling Presence of
the Divine. The ninety-nine names of God as found in the Qur’an are an
emphasis in Sufi worship and doctrine. These especially reveal the nature and
attributes of Allah.
1 Inayat Khan, The Soul, Whence and Whither (London /
The Hague: East-West Publications, 1984) p. 9;quoted in Dr. H. J. Witteveen, Universal
Sufism (Rockport, Massachusetts: Element, 1997) p. 65.
2 Annemarie Schimmel, Mystical Dimensions of Islam (Chapel
Hill, North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press, 1975) p. 266.
Theosophy: Presents a monistic and pantheistic view of God (All is One
and All is God). Ultimate Reality is an impersonal ‘Life Force.’ “We
reject the idea of a personal…God.”1 “God
and man are the two phases of the one eternal life and consciousness that
constitutes our universe! The idea of the immanence of God is that he is the
universe; although he is also more than it is; that the solar system is an
emanation of the Supreme Being as clouds are an emanation of the sea…It is the
idea that nothing exists except God, and that humanity is one portion of him-one
phase of his Being.”2
1 Helena P. Blavatsky, The Key to Theosophy (Pasadena,
California: Theosophical University Press, 1995) p. 61 (unabridged printing of
original 1889 ed., with new index).
2 L.W. Rogers, Elementary Theosophy (Wheaton,
Illinois: The Theosophical Press, 1956) p. 23.
Transcendental Meditation (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi): “God has two
aspects, the personal and the impersonal…The impersonal aspect of God is
formless, supreme; It is eternal and absolute Being. It is without attributes,
qualities, or features, because all attributes, qualities, and features belong
to the relative field of life, whereas the impersonal God is of an absolute
nature.”1 “God is one; It appears as many,
however. The appearance of the one as many is only phenomenal. The reality of
the one impersonal God is still eternal and absolute.”2
A pantheistic view of God is promoted: “Everything in creation is a
manifestation of the unmanifested absolute impersonal being, the omnipresent
God.”3
1 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, Science of Being and Art of
Living (New York: Meridian, an imprint of Dutton Signet, a division of
Penguin Books, 1995) p. 268.
2 Ibid., p. 267.
3 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, Transcendental Meditation, p.
266; quoted in Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Handbook of Today’s Religions
(Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1983) p. 83.
United Church of Religious Science (Dr. Ernest Holmes): Taught that
God is “the Neutral Force,” yet personal to those who believe in “the
Infinite.” He redefined the Christian concept of the Trinity using the
following descriptions: “The Father [is] the supreme creative Principle…[and]
means Absolute Being.”1 Furthermore, “the entire
manifestation of the Infinite in any and all planes, levels, states of
consciousness, or manifestations, constitutes the Son.”2 Finally,
“the Holy Ghost signifies the feminine aspect of the Divine Trinity. It
represents the divine activity of the higher mental plane.”3 Ernest
Holmes’ concept of God was pantheistic, promoting the idea that the cosmos is
the “entire manifestation of Spirit”4 and that “God is
in everything.”5
1 Ernest Holmes, What Religious Science Teaches (Los
Angeles: Science of Mind Publications, 1975) p. 61.
2 Ibid., p. 64.
3 Ibid., p. 65.
4 Ernest Holmes, A Dictionary of New Thought Terms (Marina
del Rey, California: DeVorss Publications, 1991) p. 28.
5 Ernest Holmes, The Science of Mind (New York: R.M
McBride and Co., 1938, New York: Penguin Putnam, Inc., rev. and enl. ed., 1966)
p. 362 (page citation is to reprint edition).
|
 |
|